M&A and corporate transactions
When a third party looks at your figures
High-stakes situations, where the figures are examined line by line by outside parties looking for reassurance, and for grounds to trust them.
First case
Preparing for a shareholder change or refinancing
Feed a due diligence straight from the monthly reporting, with no heavy preparation project; record normalization and pro forma at every close.
What is at stake
- A solid set of figures, ready to feed a due diligence
- A review run quickly, with limited preparation
- Refinancing documents built on the same basis
How EPMind delivers
- Normalization and pro forma
- Normalization adjustments, non-recurring items, and the pro forma of an older acquisition are recorded at every close, at configurable levels, with their justification — and kept current, rather than frozen at the date of the deal.
- Limited preparation
- What a review asks for is largely covered by the monthly reporting process, not by a project opened for the occasion: there is no rebuilding to do before opening the figures to third parties.
- Audit trail
- Traceability runs from the aggregate down to the journal entry, and it is kept end to end: that is what most makes the figures you circulate worth trusting.
Capabilities involved: Audit trail and control · Non-recurring items and pro forma
Second case
Supporting a carve-out
Consolidate a simulated scope with the mechanics of a statutory consolidation; quantify several outlines and compare them before settling on one.
What is at stake
- Standalone accounts before standalone systems
- A scope that does not exist yet, consolidated as though it did
- Several possible outlines, quantified and comparable
- Updating made straightforward
How EPMind delivers
- Pro forma consolidation
- A simulated scope is consolidated with the mechanics of a statutory consolidation — levels, eliminations, top-side consolidation entries — and not in a spreadsheet kept alongside.
- Audit trail preserved
- It does not stop at the edge of the simulated scope: traceability runs from the aggregate to the journal entry, as it does on actuals.
- Scope simulations
- Outlines are drawn and replayed quickly, and compared with one another before one is settled on.
- Updating
- The scope keeps trading month after month. There is no need to redo everything each month: the update rests on the rules already set and on refreshed data.
Capabilities involved: Statutory and consolidated · Scenarios and scope simulations · Audit trail and control
Third case
Integrating an acquisition
Bring a target into the group closing process from the first month; read the consolidated reporting as though the acquisition had always been there.
What is at stake
- A closing process the target can apply as it stands
- Every target connected without waiting for the systems to be harmonized
- A group-level view from the first shared close
How EPMind delivers
- The closing process comes with it
- The target steps into a process that is already defined — collection, checks, approval, period lock — rather than into a harmonization project to be run first.
- Connecting an entity
- A standard account mapping framework, with automated detection and enrichment under supervision and approval. No prior harmonization.
- Pro forma from the first close
- Views with and without the acquisition scope are native: the period reads as though the acquisition had always been part of the group, and organic growth holds up from one quarter to the next.
Capabilities involved: Source of truth and multi-ERP mapping · Collection and workflow · Non-recurring items and pro forma
Need help preparing a transaction?
Describe the transaction and its timetable. We will tell you what the platform changes about it, and what it does not.